How It WorksHow it worksWhat it doesViewable impressionsPayments and vouchersBy industrySystem statusPricingCompareAll comparisonsCoinzilla alternativevs AdButlervs Epomvs Broadstreetvs DanAdsvs Equativvs Google Ad Managervs Kevelvs Revivewith AdSensevs EzoicResourcesResource hubBlogAd tech glossaryHelp centreAd rate plannerAdSense rejected?AdSense alternativesAdvertise Here generatorBy industryFAQAboutContactLog inSee the demo

Compare

Pyrobid vs everyone else

Price, product and who owns your advertisers, side by side. Every figure is quoted from the competitor's own published pricing and dated, so you can check it yourself.

11
platforms compared
5 of 11
publish no price or take rate
$29.99
our entry price, portal included
0%
our cut of your direct deals
Network Revenue share, undisclosed

Pyrobid vs Coinzilla

For crypto publishers. Rent revenue from a network, or own the advertiser relationship yourself. Coinzilla does not publish what it takes.

Read the comparison ›
Ad server $179/mo entry

Pyrobid vs AdButler

Their entry tier is $179. The self-serve advertiser marketplace, which is our whole product, is a separate add-on listed at $2,200 plus 3.5% of revenue.

Read the comparison ›
Ad server $250/mo entry

Pyrobid vs Epom

Their entry tier is $250 a month, and putting your own brand on it adds another $250. Ours is $29.99, with your branding and the portal included.

Read the comparison ›
Ad server $299/mo entry

Pyrobid vs Broadstreet

Their entry tier is $299 a month, and they have publicly decided not to build self-serve advertiser buying at all.

Read the comparison ›
Enterprise Contact sales only

Pyrobid vs DanAds

A self-serve advertiser portal is their core product too, across digital and offline inventory. They publish no pricing anywhere.

Read the comparison ›
Ad server Free at most volumes

Pyrobid vs Google Ad Manager

Free, and built for an ad ops team you do not have. No self-serve advertiser portal, and Google policy decides which verticals you may run.

Read the comparison ›
Self-hosted Free, you host it

Pyrobid vs Revive

Free to download. You supply the server, the updates and the database, and the advertiser login is read only.

Read the comparison ›
API first Not published

Pyrobid vs Kevel

Built for retail media networks and marketplaces, and sold through a sales team. No published price, no trial and no way to start without a call.

Read the comparison ›
SSP Contact sales only

Pyrobid vs Equativ

Formerly Smart AdServer. A large independent SSP that brings programmatic demand. They publish no price and no shopfront for your own advertisers.

Read the comparison ›
Monetisation Revenue share, not published

Pyrobid vs Ezoic

Ezoic fills your slots with programmatic demand, but only above 250,000 monthly users, and asks to be the only ad code on your site. We have no traffic minimum.

Read the comparison ›
Network Revenue share

Pyrobid with AdSense

Not a competitor. Keep AdSense filling what you have not sold, and put direct deals on top of it at your own price.

Read the comparison ›

What the category actually costs

Published entry pricing, taken from each vendor's own page on 16 September 2026.

PlatformEntry price Self-serve advertiser portalCost per million impressions
Pyrobid$29.99/moIncluded$29.99
AdButler$179/moAdd-on, $2,200 + 3.5%$179.00
Epom Ad Server$250/moNot published$29.41
Broadstreet$299/moNot offered, by their own statementNo published cap
DanAdsNot publishedCore productNot published
KevelNot publishedKevel Console, branded as yoursNot published
EquativNot publishedNot published for publishersNot published

Cost per million uses each vendor's published entry tier volume, before any branding add-on. Where a figure is missing it is because the vendor does not publish one.

What a year actually costs

The same job at every vendor: a self-serve advertiser portal, on your own domain, with targeting. Every figure is the vendor's own published price multiplied by twelve, read on 16 September 2026.

Pyrobid$99.99/moAdButler$179/mo + add-onsEpom$250/mo + add-onsBroadstreet$299/mo
Base platform$1,199.88Pro, five million a month$2,148$179 a month$3,000$250 a month$3,588$299 a month
Self-serve advertiser portalIncludedboth plans$2,200 or $26,400plus 3.5% of revenueNot publishedno figure givenNot offeredby their own position
Your own domainIncludedon Pro$708from $59 a month$3,000white-label, $250 a monthNot publishedno figure given
Advanced targetingIncludedboth plans$3,360from $275 a month plus CPMIncludedin the planNot publishedno figure given
Share of your direct dealsNoneever3.5%through the portalNone publishedNone published
First year, total$1,199.88$8,416or $32,616 if the portal fee is monthly$6,000and no portal at any published price$3,588and no self-serve buying at all
You keepBaseline$7,216to $31,416 on the monthly reading$4,800for a narrower product$2,388for a different product

AdButler prints "/month" beside every add-on except the self-serve marketplace, which reads "$2200 +3.5% of Generated Revenue" with no period. We do not know which they mean, so both are shown. Epom and Broadstreet totals are for what they do sell: neither publishes a price for a self-serve advertiser portal, and Broadstreet has said publicly they do not build one. DanAds, Kevel and Equativ publish nothing at all and cannot appear in a table like this. Check every figure yourself before you act on it.

How we write these

Comparison pages are usually written to make the other product look stupid. These are not.

Compared on what you actually buy

Every page compares what a publisher gets: the portal, the payments, the price, and who owns the advertiser.

Every figure is dated and sourced

Quoted from the vendor's own page with the date we read it. Pricing changes, so the date is there to check against.

We say when something is not published

Three of these eleven publish no pricing at all, and two more take a share of revenue without publishing the rate. We write "not published" rather than guessing a number that would look authoritative and be invented.

Common questions

Are these comparisons biased?

We make one of the products, so every claim is built to be checked: each figure is quoted from the competitor's own page and dated, and where a figure is not published we say so rather than guess.

Why do some competitors have no prices?

DanAds, Kevel and Equativ do not publish pricing anywhere. Coinzilla and Ezoic take a share of revenue and do not publish the rate. Those are real findings rather than gaps in our research, and they tell you something about who each one sells to.

Which comparison should I read first?

If you are weighing an ad network like Coinzilla, start there, because the question is about who owns your advertiser relationships rather than about software. If you are shopping ad servers, start with AdButler.

Do you compare against Google Ad Manager?

Yes, the page is at Pyrobid vs Google Ad Manager. It is a trafficking console rather than a way to sell, so the comparison that matters is about how an advertiser buys from you, not about price.

Keep what you run. Sell direct on top.

Whatever you are running now keeps serving underneath Pyrobid as the fallback. Direct deals fill first, anything unsold falls through to what you already have.

Start free trial

14 days free. Your existing ads keep running. Cancel anytime.